It had been released in August of 2003, 5 months after the Arvizo family left Neverland (the accusations had already been released to the public). In the trial, the boy accusing Michael Jackson Gavin Arvizo attempted to confirm one of the alleged magazines Michael Jackson had forced upon Arvizo (meaning Arvizo would have fingerprints on it). This is the part no one seems to either want to understand or acknowledge.
One of the so called “findings” is a picture of Michael Jackson and his nephews for a music video from 1995. Speaking of that trial, Michael Jackson NEVER had any child pornography in his possession. If the FBI investigated Michael Jackson for 20+ years, don’t you think they would have found these “new findings” and used them against him in his 2005 trial? They literally wrote “NOTHING” on each of their reports The FBI investigated Michael Jackson for twenty years after the false accusations of 1993, they released their findings in 2012 and found NOTHING. This case and these accusations were proven false not only in court, but through the FBI. This is long and the only time I’m going to speak about this. I’ve read the FBI files and read many of the 68 released transcripts and testimonies of the trial from both sides of the case.
believing anything they read because its on a website or on TV or on a stupid ass british tabloid regarding the false accusations of Michael Jackson. I’m tired of people on this site, on twitter, on instagram, etc. Okay this is the first and last time I’m ever going to address this disgusting, ignorant, and idiotic shit about Michael Jackson.
0 kommentar(er)
